Nursing Birth

One Labor & Delivery Nurse’s View From the Inside

How one mom “Walked, moved around, and changed positions” to a successful hospital VBAC! October 23, 2009

Science and Sensibility’s Healthy Birth Blog Carnival #2Walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor

 

This month’s Healthy Birth Blog Carnival is “Walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor.”  This is a repost from a story I wrote back in March however, I feel like it is a really great example of how important movement and position changes are to a successful labor and birth, especially a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC)!  This story has been a popular posts with my readers in the past and I hope by participating in this blog carnival it reaches and helps empower more and more expecting women out there!!  In reposting this story I have highlighted all the times where Alyssa used upright positions and movement to cope with pain, help her uterus contract more efficiently, help her baby find the best position in her birth canal, use gravity to her advantage, and be an active participant in her labor!  And there is no doubt in my mind that all of these things helped her have a safe, positive and empowering VBAC experience!

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Last week I had the honor to be a part of one of the most beautiful VBAC(Vaginal Birth After Cesarean) hospital births I have ever witnessed. I would like to share that couple’s story with you today as both a feel-good tale of personal triumph and a story of inspiration for all those moms planning a VBAC out there that might stumble upon my blog. Since this is a blog about “a nurse’s view from the inside” this story is probably much different than any other birth story you might have read from the mother or father’s point of view. But then again, maybe that isn’t so bad! Enjoy!

 

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

It was ten to 11 o’clock am as I walked through the lobby doors of the hospital I work at, rushing towards the elevator so I could punch in on time. As the elevator doors started to close, a hand shoved through the crack, forcing the doors back open. “Please make room!”said the woman, a phlebotomist who works in the hospital, in a shaky voice, “Woman in labor here!!”Following behind was a very pregnant woman, huffing and puffing as she waddled into the elevator, followed by what looked like her husband and her mother. “Don’t touch any buttons!”said the phlebotomist, “We’re going right up to labor & delivery!” Since that was where I was headed too, I smiled at the husband and said, “Don’t worry, you’re here now and she won’t have the baby in your car! I work up on L&D so I’ll show you were to register.” Something told me that if this woman was truly in labor then she would be assigned to me since I was just starting my shift. But she had to “pass” triage first, so after helping the family to the registration desk, I hurried into the locker room to change into my scrubs.

 

 

 Fifteen minutes later the triage nurse came to the main desk, “I’ve got a term mom, 40 weeks 5 days, who’s five centimeters,” she said, “We’re gonna need to put her in a room…. And she’s a VBAC with a ‘birth plan’.” “I’ll take her!,” I said excitingly, knowing that I have my bestdays when I can assist a woman through labor, as opposed to getting stuck on the OR team or in the high risk ward running magnesium. (Not that those women don’t need a lot of TLC too, it’s just that I like labor the most!) Birth plans, natural unmedicated labor, and getting my patients out of bed…those are my specialties!

 

 I quickly set up the room across the hall as the resident finished the patient’s history and physical in the triage room. Then I quietly knocked on the triage room door and let myself in. The patient, Alyssa*, was standing by the bed, rocking her hips back and forth, as the continuous monitors strapped to her abdomen traced the baby’s heart rate and her contraction pattern. It looked like she was contracting every 3 minutes, and the baby’s heart rate was beautiful and reassuring. Her husband, Jared, was leaning nervously against the wall and her mom, Deb, was sitting quietly in the corner. I could really tell that Alyssa was lost in “Laborland” and I wanted to make the transition to her room as seamless as possible as to not break her rhythm and concentration too much. I quietly introduced myself and with the help of Jared and Deb, moved all of their belongings across the hall as Alyssa waddled behind.

  

 I could tell that Alyssa was coping well with the contractions while standing but a quick glance at her prenatal summary revealed that she was Group B Strep positive and would need IV antibiotics (our hospital’s policy and the midwife’s order) and hence, and IV. Now I feel that I am pretty skilled at starting IVs, but I have not yet mastered starting an IV with the patient standing and swaying! So in the two minutes between the contractions, I explained to the Alyssa what I needed to do before the admission process was complete: get 5 more minutes of continuous monitoring on the baby (to equal the “20 minute strip” my hospital’s policy requires before we can switch to intermittent auscultation), take a set of vital signs, draw three tubes of blood, start an IV, and ask a few more questions. “Give me 8 minutes sitting on the bed,” I said, “and I can have everything but the interview done. The rest of the admission can be done with you standing up.” “Okay,” she said, “I can do eight minutes.” Eight minutes later the IV was in, antibiotic running, labs drawn and sent, vital signs done, monitors were removed, and the patient was helped out of bed (Phew!! That was close!! J). And it wasn’t a moment too soon because Alyssa was having a lot of back labor and sitting in bed was just making it worse!

 

 

 

Then there was a knock at the door. Here’s how the subsequent conversation went down…

 

Me: “Who is it?”

Med Student: “It’s just the medical student,” (said as he walked right into the room)

(I hadn’t yet gotten a chance to ask Alyssa if she was okay with medical students so I just kind of looked over at her and Jared and tried to judge their reaction.)

Med Student: “Hi I’m Michael. I have to ask you a few questions.”

(Have? How about “Is it okay if I ask you a few questions? Sheesh!!)

Med Student: “Are you being induced today?” (asked as he stared down at his paper)

Alyssa: “INDUCED! DOES IT LOOK LIKE I AM BEING INDUCED!”

Med Student:“Okaaaaay. Umm, any problems with this pregnancy?”

Jared: “Do you really need to ask these questions right now? The resident already asked her that stuff.”

Med Student:“Umm yeaaaah, I do. There is a lot of repetition but we have to ask again.”

Deb: “Doesn’t her prenatal summary tell you all of that?

Med Student: “Ummmmm….”

Me: “With all do respect, Michael. But I think they are trying to tell you that they do not want any medical students. Or anymore residents for that matter. Okay? So I think we are done here.”

Med Student:“Ummm, what am I supposed to tell the resident?”

Me: “Tell her I said that the next induction that comes in is all yours.”

 

As the med student left, Jared, Deb, and Alyssa all looked at me simultaneously and said “THANK YOU!” “I don’t think he was getting the hint,” said Jared. “Yeah,” I said, “I figured he needed it spelled out.” In hind sight, I think this was one of the moments that really helped me to bond with this family because after all, I understand how difficult it must be for families to come into the hospital and have to work with a nurse that they have even never met during one of the most intimate experiences of their lives!

 

I spent the next fifteen minutes finishing up the patient’s admission assessment as quickly as I could. I told Alyssa that if she was having a contraction to just ignore me, and asked Jared to help answer any questions he knew the answers to. (Unfortunately, our hospital’s pre-registration does not include performing an admission assessment and hence, it has to be done on arrival to the hospital. Usually, if a patient comes in for false/early labor a time or two, it gets done then but Alyssa had not been to the hospital her whole pregnancy, which is great, but it meant that I did have to bother her with some silly questions during labor. Kind of a bummer, but with the help of Jared, it went pretty smoothly.) It was during the admission interview that I found out some of the details of Alyssa’s pregnancy and prior cesarean section. Alyssa had an unremarkable health history and a normal, healthy, uncomplicated pregnancy. She was a G2P1, but since her first baby was born by cesarean section, she technically was considered to be a “primip” (healthcare slang a woman who is about to deliver her first baby) regarding a vaginal delivery.

 

Jared told me that when their son was born two years ago, Alyssa was persuaded into an induction at 39 weeks for “LGA” (a.k.a. large for gestational age, which by the way is NOT recognized as an appropriate indication for induction of labor by ACOG), was first given a few doses of misoprostol to “ripen” the cervix, followed by pitocin to stimulate contractions and continuous external fetal monitoring to monitor those contractions, then given a couple doses of Stadol and eventually an epidural for the pain, followed by artificial rupture of membranes to place a fetal scalp electrode after the epidural dropped Alyssa’s blood pressure and caused a prolonged fetal heart rate (FHR) deceleration, then an intrauterine pressure catheter to assess if the pitocin induced contractions were “adequate”, and eventually a cesarean section after 1 hour of pushing in a back-lying position for “failure to descent & cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD).” Thirty minutes later baby Kevin was born at approximately 2:00am, weighing in at 7lbs, 5 oz.

 

In my opinion, Alyssa was a victim of the “cascade of interventions.” Many maternity interventions, including elective induction, pain medication, artificial rupture of membranes, epidural anesthesia, back-lying positions for labor or for birth, etc. have unintended effects. Often these effects are new problems that are “solved” with further intervention causing a domino effect that ends up creating yet more problems. This chain of events has been called the “cascade of intervention” and unfortunately often leads to vacuum extraction/ forceps delivery, episiotomies or 3rd or 4thdegree tears, and even cesarean section. Many of these women are often also then mislabeled with diagnoses like “CPD,” “failure to progress,” “failure to descent,” and at the end of it all, the obstetricians turn around and say, “Thank God we were in a hospital; look at all the technology we needed! So when will your repeat cesarean be??”

 

This time, however, things were different. After the birth of their son, Alyssa and Jared started to research more about labor and birth, VBAC, and natural birth. They interviewed and chose a doctor (Dr. Z) that was supportive of natural birth and VBACs, with the statistics to prove it! And here they were now, at my hospital, ready and rearing to go! Alyssa said that for the past few days she had been having contractions “on and off” but that they really started to get going at 8:00 am. When the resident had checked her on admission, her water spontaneously broke during the vaginal exam at 11:15am. It was now 11:45am and Dr. Z’s midwife entered the room. Although it had only been 30 minutes since her last vaginal exam, the midwife decided she would check Alyssa again since she seemed pretty active. And boy was she ever! The midwife’s exam showed that Alyssa had progressed to 7-8 centimeters! “I don’t think I can do this anymore,” Alyssa softly whimpered to the midwife. We all reassured her that she was doing so well and that things were getting more intense for a reason and to stick with it!!

 

The midwife then offered to help Alyssa into the shower to help alleviate her back pain. Alyssa seemed skeptical at first but we assured her that if it wasn’t helping, that we could get her right back out. So Alyssa agreed and the midwife and I, along with Jared, helped the patient into the shower. What happened for the next hour was one of the most beautiful displays of love, perseverance, hard work, and dedication I have ever witnessed. Alyssa turned her back to us and rested her hands on the grab bar on the shower and her head on the shower wall. Her cadence was this: Between contractions she would sway side to side, as if she was slow dancing. During contractions she would squat up and down, up and down, moaning in a low tone as she carried out her ritual. She just moved with the rhythm of her labor, listening so instinctively to what her baby and her body were telling her to do.Jared used the hand held shower head to spray Alyssa gently with a stream of warm water up and down her body, concentrating mostly on her lower back. I quietly entered the bathroom a few times that hour to check the baby’s heart rate with the portable doptone, trying hard not to disturb Alyssa’s concentration. Mostly, however, the midwife, her mother, and I stayed outside the bathroom door as to give Alyssa & Jared the privacy they needed to facilitate the progress of her labor.

 

At 12:35pm Alyssa told me that she was starting to feel a strong urge to push. The midwife entered the room and as Alyssa knelt in a hands and knees position in the tub, the midwife checked her cervix. To everyone’s surprise Alyssa only had an anterior lip of cervix left to go (this means she was about 9 ½ centimeters dilated)! After the next contraction, Jared and I helped Alyssa out of the shower to the toilet where we both used warm towels to dry her off. Then Alyssa walked over to the bed, “Can I kneel on my hands and knees?” she asked. “Sure!” we all said in unison, as we helped her up onto the bed. “I feel like I have to push!” Alyssa said convincingly and when the midwife checked her cervix, the anterior lip was gone…Alyssa was fully dilated at 12:45pm, only 1 hour and 55 minutes after arriving at the hospital! “You can start to push anytime,” said the midwife.

 

One of the best things about being a part of this experience was the fact that it was one of the only times that I have been present at a delivery where that a birth attendant has allowed the mother to use spontaneous or mother-directed pushing, as opposed to directed pushing. I knew that Alyssa was interested in using a variety of pushing positions for the second stage of labor from her birth plan and for the next hour and a half the midwife, Jared, Deb, and I helped Alyssa get into a variety of positions including right/left side lying, squatting, hands and knees, and kneeling.

 

(Side Note: I would like to digress for a moment to point out how important it is to be physically fit during your pregnancy whether you are planning for a natural birth or not. Many a woman I take care of blindly fills out a “birth plan” they find online where they can click on the boxes for options that sound “good” to them, without actually researching or thinking over what they are writing down. For example, they say that they want to try squatting during labor and birth, but couldn’t even do a squat at the gym pre-pregnancy. Although it is definitely true that a woman can sum up and realize an incredible amount of strength during labor and birth related to not only hormones but also sheer will power, it should also be known that labor is HARD WORK and pushing out a baby is HARD WORK which both require a great deal of physical strength and stamina. This is yet another reason why it is so important to follow a modified exercise plan and eat a healthy well balanced diet rich in protein and omega-3 fatty acids before, during, and even after your pregnancy.) Let’s continue with Alyssa’s story…

 

What was so amazing was that although there were plenty of times during the labor and pushing phase that Alyssa would doubt her ability to go on (“I can’t do this anymore!” “The baby isn’t moving?” “Is the baby moving?” “I am so tired!”), she never gave up on herself. Each time she made a comment like that, we all took it as a request for more support. And every time we gave her more encouragement, cheers, and reminders of her progress and goals, (“Keep going!”, “You are doing so well!”, “We can see so much more of the baby’s head!”, “She has lots of hair!”, “Just a few pushes more”, “You are so strong, you are going to do this!”, “You can do this!”), she found the ability to keep going! Towards the end of the pushing stage Alyssa was (understandably) exhausted and was pushing in a modified lithotomy position while Jared and I supported both of her legs. Then all of a sudden Alyssa popped up and said (and I quote)…

 

“I need GRAVITY! I need to be UP!” as she sat upright into a full squat and

PUSHED her baby’s head out with one gigantic ROAR!

 

“Whoa, whoa!” the midwife and I said almost simultaneously, “Easy, easy, baby pushes.” “Blow like you are blowing out birthday candles,” I said. The midwife checked for a cord around the neck (which there was none) and cleared the baby’s mouth and nose. And with only a few more “baby pushes” Addison Joy was born at 2:27pm!

 

The room erupted into cheers of excitement and tears of happiness! I put the baby skin to skin on mom as I dried her off with warm blankets and cleared her mouth and nose with the bulb suction. A quick palpation of the baby’s cord revealed that her heart rate was nice and strong and she was pinking right up! Jared and Alyssa kept hugging and kissing each other and talking to their new baby girl, “Hi Addison! Hi baby girl! I am so glad to finally meet you!”  The midwife waited until the cord stopped pulsating before she cut it (per mom and dad’s birth plan) and then checked Alyssa for any tears. Except for some swelling, she only had a small tear on her right labia that didn’t even require any stitches!! We kept mom and baby skin to skin for a full hour after birth and baby Addison nursed almost the whole time. When she was an hour old, I weighed her to satisfy mom’s curiosity and to everyone’s surprise the baby weighed 9 lbs 3 ozs!!!

 

So much for “cephalopelvic disproportion” huh!!

 

And it was as I handed baby Addison back to Alyssa that she looked up at me and said softly, “I needed to know my body could do it. I knew my body could do it! I really needed this. Thank you.” So as you can imagine, I started to well up. I have never felt so honored to be a part of something so special. What a privilege to have a job where I witness the miracle of birth and the miracle of motherhood every week!

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

So let’s recap shall we. Alyssa, after having a cesarean section for her 7 lb 5oz son two years earlier for “CPD” and “failure to descent”, pushed out a 9lb 3oz baby after a 6 hour and 27 minute labor, including 1 hour and 42 minute of mother-directed pushing, without any pain medications or an epidural, monitored by intermittent auscultation, needing not a single stitch to her perineum! Her tools included good and relevant labor & birth preparation, appropriate and helpful family support, sheer strength, determination, and will power. The midwife’s arsenal included extensive knowledge of and experience with natural birth and labor support, a doptone, a trust in birth, and a belief in Alyssa’s ability to do it! No medications, no vacuums, no scalpels, no scissors, and no doubt!

 

Boy how I love my job sometimes :)

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

*As always, names and any identifying information have been changed to protect privacy.

 

For more information on VBAC please visit: International Cesarean Awareness Network and Childbirth Connection

 

For more information on how you can move and groove through your labor check out: 

  • The Healthy Birth Practice Paper, written by Teri Shilling, MS, CD(DONA), IBCLC, LCCE, FACCE
  •  

  • The Healthy Birth Your Way handout on movement in labor(PDF), produced by Lamaze International and InJoy Birth & Parenting Videos
  •  

  • Companion tip sheets, “Maintaining Freedom of Movement” (PDF) and “Positions for Labor” (PDF)
  •  

    The Ol’ Bait and Switch, OR Finding Out Your OB Has Been Leading You On October 21, 2009

    Submitted on 2009/10/20 at 3:24pm

    Comment under: Urgent Message from ICAN! Please Spread the Word!!

    Dear Nursing Birth,

     

    I’m a day short of 35 weeks pregnant today and went in for an OB appointment this morning. My doctor said that if I don’t go into labor on my own in my 39th week that (depending on how much and if my cervix is dilated) she might put me on pitocin- although she did say that “they don’t induce labor for VBAC patients”. But that they won’t let me go to 40 weeks, and that by 40 weeks they will have to schedule another c-section for me. (I live in Cedar Falls, IA)

     

    I am shocked and angry! First of all- since when is 40 weeks, too late? My OB says it’s not wise to go to beyond 40 weeks due to increased risk of uterine rupture. But this just sounds like B.S. to me!

     

    And how does the doc get away with not telling me something important like this until NOW? Unbelievable!!  My doctor and I have already gone through my birth plan, line by line, because I want as few interventions as possible and no drugs, seeking a natural vaginal childbirth. I’ve taken 12 weeks of Bradley method birth classes to help my husband and I be better prepared this time.  I also have a fantastic, knowledgeable, and supportive doula. But I can’t believe what a fight it is to have a VBAC!

     

    If I had known sooner that this was the doctor/hospital policy for VBAC, I probably would have gone somewhere else. Since it’s so late in the game now, I’m probably going to stick it out. I don’t have to do anything they say, I can always stay at home and come in when I’m ready, and that will be after I am already in deep labor on my own.

     

    I was just wondering if perhaps this reflects a change in my hospital’s policy for managing VBAC? One of the other OB’s I met with at the hospital said that after a high maintenance VBAC patient a few months ago (who also insisted on a natural vaginal childbirth, and did it, but most of the hospital staff were very unhappy dealing with this patient…?) that the hospital is reviewing whether to allow VBAC at all. I’m probably not helping the situation by openly trying to avoid their planned interventions. I KNOW I’m required to have continuous electronic fetal monitoring… but I’ve also been told that my labor has to be pretty much “text book” regarding continuous dilation of my cervix, and of course no tolerance for fetal distress…or else!

     

    I just wish all women would know this before their first c-section. If you thought recovering from a c-section was bad, wait till you try to have a VBAC and deal with the red tape and lack of support from the medical community. It’s just so frustrating to have to be prepared to battle, and yet relax at the same time! 

     

    Have you heard of this kind of change in management of VBAC? That VBAC isn’t even allowed to go to 40 weeks?? Thanks for writing such an informative, educational blog and for being so supportive of natural childbirth! I have enjoyed your tips and insight from the hospital perspective (about writing birth plans, and managing your OB, and also the many ways hospital staff really will be supportive- even if you barf!).

     

    Sincerely,

    Kelly

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Dear Kelly,

    WOW!  I am so sorry that this is happening to you.  You story deeply saddens, frustrates, and angers me because unfortunately YOU ARE NOT ALONE!  Women all over this country have to fight everyday for their VBACs.  Too many are unsuccessful.

    First off I want you to know that your gut is absolutely right; 40 weeks is NOT too late and the research does NOT support your obstetrician’s claims.

    Second, if that hospital is actually considering revising their entire VBAC “policy” in response to one mother who, as it sounds to me, shook the boat a little bit by demanding better care as well as exercising her right to informed refusal, they are absolutely outrageous and ridiculous!  I would be skeptical of that story if I hadn’t recently read this about the sign placed at the entrance of the Aspen’s Women Center in Provo, Utah.

    Third, sounds to me like you did everything right!  You found what you thought was a VBAC supportive care provider, you researched your options and decided you wanted to stack as many cards in your favor as you could for a successful VBAC by planning a drug-free/intervention-free childbirth, you wrote up a birth planthat you painstakingly went through “line by line” with your physician early on in your pregnancy, you have sought out and taken childbirth preparation classes that are geared towards not only providing knowledge about how to have a successful natural childbirth but also help in preparing mentally and emotionally for such an important journey (and on top of that you took those classes with your husband!), and you even hired a doula.  (Yup!  Just as I suspected…you did everything you could!)  So what happened?!?!…

    Unfortunately you are a victim of the ol’ bait and switch.

    It happens to women everyday around this country.  And its existence is further proof that our maternity system is broken, in shambles really.  There are some obstetricians, family practice physicians, and yes, even midwives that have become really friggin’ good at this awful game.  Women write in to me all the time with similar frustrations and complaints as yours, Kelly.  And I always find myself helpless and speechless.  I don’t know how to help women avoid it and I struggle everyday in my own professional life with how to fight it and stop it!

    The worst part of the ol’ bait and switch is the feeling of betrayal that most women report experiencing after they have been victimized they this outrageous action.  (I want to note that I used the terms “betrayal” and “victimized” on purpose.  I understand that they are very strong words but I feel they are the best to describe this very serious phenomenon).  So why does it happen?  Both from what I have personally experienced as a labor and delivery nurse as well as what I have read (for example: Born in the U.S.A by Marsden Wagner and Pushed by Jennifer Block) there is not one simple answer for why some healthcare providers use this “technique.”  But there is no doubt in my mind that money, greed, fear of litigation, fear of losing patients, competition, superciliousness, willful ignorance, impatience, convenience, blatant disregard for evidenced based medicine, favoritism for the “because we’ve always done it this way” model of practice as well as favoritism for the paternalistic provider-patient model of practice (that is, the care provider only presents information on risks and benefits of a procedure/test etc. that he or she thinks will lead the patient to make the “right” decision (i.e. the provider supported decision) regarding health care) all have something to do with it.  Providers who practice the ol’ bait and switch fall somewhere on the, what I like to call “Asshole to Apathy,” spectrum.   Some may be bigger assholes than others, but in the end, they all fall somewhere on that spectrum in my experience.

    [PHEW!  Okay, WOW!  Now I’m all worked up!  Sorry, sorry!  I don’t know where that rant just came from!  But this kind of thing really burns by britches!]

    So Kelly, you must be thinking, “Where does this leave me?”  The good news is that Kristen, a philosophical doula blogger friend of mine over at BirthingBeautifulIdeas is author of an amazing series she calls “VBAC Scare Tactics” which I think is a resource that you, and other moms in your situation, might find very helpful.  What you are describing sounds to me like VBAC scare tactics (#3): An early eviction date (aka “I’ll let you attempt a ‘trial of labor’ just as long as you go into labor before your due date.  After that, we’re scheduling a repeat cesarean.”)

    In each post she identifies one particular scare tactic, supplies a list of questions that a mother can ask her care provider in response to this scare tactic, and then provides an analysis and/or summary of the research that either challenges or even debunks the scare tactic and its insinuations.  In the introduction to the series she writes,

     

    “Many women who want to have a vaginal birth after cesarean (or VBAC, pronounced “vee-back”) in this country have faced some sort of opposition from their care providers when they have expressed their desire to VBAC.

     

    Sometimes this opposition is blatant.  Sometimes this opposition becomes obvious only at the end of the third trimester. (Many VBAC-ing moms refer to this tactic as a “bait-and-switch” since it involves a supposedly VBAC-supportive care provider rescinding this support once the actual VBAC is imminent.)  Sometimes even a care provider’s “support” of VBAC is instead a conditional, half-hearted, or perhaps sneakily-disguised opposition to VBAC.  These “scare tactics” are often misleading, exaggerated efforts by OBs (and yes, even midwives) to discourage women from VBAC and to encourage them to “choose” a repeat cesarean.  (Of course, it’s not really a choice if your provider won’t even “let” you VBAC, is it?)

     

    If you do find yourself facing such scare tactics, and if you do want to have a VBAC, there are some questions that your care provider should be able to answer when s/he hurls those scary and/or outrageous comments and standards your way.  And if s/he refuses to or even cannot answer these questions, then you might want to consider finding an alternative care provider–one who is making medical decisions based on research, evidence, and even respect for your patient autonomy and not on fear, willful ignorance, or even convenience.”

    Things I love about BirthingBeautifulIdeas’ VBAC scare tactic posts include:

    #1    Her writing is organized and clear.  (You know how much I love organization and lists!)

    #2    She respects research and understands the importance of evidenced based medicine. (In fact, the reason BirthingBeautifulIdeas is aware of much of the research she cites is because she actually used said research studies in weighing her own decision about whether to have an elective repeat cesarean section or instead prepare and plan for a VBAC.)

    #3    She has personal experience with this subject.  (In fact she not only experienced a VBAC scare tactic and the “bait-and-switch” with her former OB, but also made the difficult decision to and successfully did transfer her care to a VBAC supportive care provider late in her pregnancy (at 37 weeks to be exact!) as well as experienced a subsequent and successful VBAC hospital water birth.  Check out her story “My very own VBAC waterbirth”.)

    #4    She does not provide advice.  As she said herself, she is NOT anti-OB nor is she telling women to do anything.  Instead she provides tools that allow women to make their own decisions and stick up for their own decisions about the birth of their babies hoping that in doing so women come out of their birth experiences feeling positive and empowered, regardless of the outcome.

    Kelly, please check out the post VBAC scare tactics (#3): An early eviction dateI was going to write to you about the research and such on the topic but BirthingBeautifulIdeas has already done such a fantastic job herself that it wouldn’t even be worth it to summarize her article.

    While I’m at it, here’s the entire VBAC scare tactics series:

    VBAC scare tactics (#1): VBAC = uterine rupture = dead baby (aka “Why would you want to risk a VBAC only to have a ruptured uterus and a dead baby?”)

    VBAC scare tactics (#2): When bad outcomes in the past affect patient options in the future (aka “I’ve seen a bad VBAC outcome, and it was terrible.  You really don’t want to choose a VBAC over a repeat cesarean.”)

    VBAC scare tactics (#3): An early eviction date (aka “I’ll let you attempt a ‘trial of labor’ just as long as you go into labor before your due date.  After that, we’re scheduling a repeat cesarean.”)

    VBAC scare tactics (#4): No pre-labor dilatation = no VBAC (aka “Since you are 39 weeks pregnant and your cervix isn’t dilated or effaced, it looks like you probably won’t go into labor on your own ‘in time.’   We need to schedule a repeat cesarean and forgo a VBAC attempt.”)

    VBAC scare tactics (#5): VBACs aren’t as safe as we thought they were (aka “You know, VBACs aren’t as safe as we thought they were.  They are much more dangerous to you and your baby.  A repeat cesarean is the safer route.”)

    A VBAC scare tactic interlude (Thoughts and resources on transferring your care to a VBAC supportive care provider, inducing labor when you have a history of a cesarean and weighing the pros and cons of pain medications and interventions if you are planning a VBAC.)

     

    VBAC scare tactics (#6): CPD or FTP = no VBAC (aka“Here in your chart, it says that your cesarean was for failure to progress (FTP).  Oh, and there’s also a note here about cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD).  You’re not really an ideal VBAC candidate since your cesarean wasn’t for fetal distress or breech presentation, so we need to schedule a repeat cesarean.”)

     

    VBAC scare tactics (#7): Playing the epidural card (aka “An epidural can mask the signs of uterine rupture, so I do not permit my VBAC patients to have an epidural during their labors.” OR “In case of an emergency cesarean, I require all of my VBAC patients to have an epidural in place in early labor.  That way, we will not have to wait for the anesthesiologist to get the epidural in place if a uterine rupture occurs.”)

    VBAC Scare Tactics (#8): The MD trump card (aka “Look, I’m the one who has earned the medical degree and I am telling you that you cannot attempt a VBAC.  Your only choice is a repeat cesarean.  Period.”)

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Kelly you wrote, “Since it’s so late in the game now, I’m probably going to stick it out. I don’t have to do anything they say, I can always stay at home and come in when I’m ready, and that will be after I am already in deep labor on my own.”  You are right.  You don’t have to do anything they say.  You have the right as a patient to both informed consent as well as informed refusal.  However I want to say a few things.  (Here comes my cyber pep-talk, meant of course to be 100% supportive of whatever you chose and not at all meant to give you advice.  But I don’t think many women get a chance to hear from anyone what I am about to tell you.  To get the full intent of this pep talk just picture me standing behind you vigorously rubbing your shoulders as I squirt water into your mouth from a sports bottle and wipe the sweat off your face.  So here it goes…)

    You deserve the opportunity to have the unmedicated, intervention-free birth that you have planned for.  Your desires for said unmedicated, intervention-free VBAC are well supported by the research.  You deserve to be cared for by a birth attendant who shares your philosophy regarding (among other things) childbirth and VBAC.  You deserve to NOT have to worry about fighting anyone to be given a fair chance at having the birth you have been planning…not the hospital, not the nursing staff, not your obstetrician, NOT ANYONE.  You deserve it for THIS birth.

    I know that it is scary to even think about transferring care to a new care provider so late in the game.  But I encourage you to at least think about it.  Even if you think that there are many limitations in your options regarding availability, insurance, distance, etc. etc, it is worth it to you to at least check it out.  I also encourage you to get in touch with your local ICAN chapter (unless, of course, you have already done that.)  Some of the members might be able to give you some suggestions on VBAC friendly care providers that they know actually attend VBACs!  Sometimes even if a VBAC friendly midwife or doctor is booked they will make an exception for a late transfer of care if a doula friend or former patient calls and asks for a favor.  (I’ve seen it happen before with my local ICAN chapter).  Also ICAN’s website has a variety of helpful articlesfor moms planning a VBAC against hospital or provider resistance.

    I can tell by your story that you are a very strong woman and my gut tells me that you will indeed fight for your rights even if you stay with your current obstetrician.  You just shouldn’t have to do that and it saddens me that any your energy is going to be dedicated to defending yourself during your birth.  Even one tiny little bit of energy devoted to that is too much!  You deserve more!  You deserve better!  I think you said it perfectly when you wrote, “It’s just so frustrating to have to be prepared to battle, and yet relax at the same time!”

     

    I couldn’t agree more!

    So Kelly, I wish you the best of luck!  And like many of my readers, I really wish I was going to be your labor and delivery nurse!  CONGRATULATIONS on your pregnancy and on your upcoming birth!  I will keep you in my thoughts and I hope that you will one day come back and tell us how your birth went!  I hope that this post has helped you in some way.  Oh and please apologize to your friends and family for me since you probably will be wasting a lot more time in front of the computer now that I have provided so much reading material!  Haha!

    Sincerely,

    NursingBirth

     

    No Doula in the Name of Privacy? Oh Come On! September 26, 2009

    This comment was recently left by a reader named Jessica under one of my older posts.  Since I read every comment that is posted on my blog I happened to stumble upon it this morning.  When I read it I couldn’t help but think “I Hear Ya Sister!!!”and felt that it was so well stated that it needed to be its own post!  I know that there are quite a few doulas out there that read my blog and I just wanted to take this opportunity and give a shout out to them all and say thank you for all you try to do to educate women before they get to me on L&D!  Unfortunately, they don’t all listen but I hope you know that there is at least one L&D nurse out there that appreciates your efforts, both before and during labor!!!

     

    For all you expecting moms out there please check out DONA’s website to learn a bit more about what a doula is, how you can find one, the effects a doula can have on your birth outcome and experience, and how a doula can advocate for you!

     

    And just for the record, there is NOTHING private about a hospital birth experience.  Even in the most well meaning hospitals with the most well meaning birth attendant and the most well meaning nurse(s).  Albeit some women’s hospital births might be more private than others and I personally have had the priviledge to be a part of a few totally amazing hospital births.  But to not hire a doula for your hospital birth (especially at a university hospital!) because you want a “private” experience is a very VERY naive and misguided idea!  I am not saying that to hurt anyone’s feelings and I am certainly not judging anyone out there who decided not to hire a doula for one reason or another.  I am just telling it like it is.  Some food for thought…

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     

    Hi NursingBirth!

    I am a certifying doula and have recently had an interview with a perspective client. She is 36wks pregnant with her first. She was strongly considering a doula, but everyone else in her family was on the fence, and pushing a “private” birth experience. However, they are planning a delivery at a university hospital, she has yet to see the same health care provider throughout her prenatal care, she has no idea which one will be at the birth, or if it will even be someone she has met. They are planning a natural birth. She assured me that the hospital she is birthing at offers a multitude of birth options, including water birth, birth ball, position changes, etc… and the childbirth education from the hospital has given them confidence in their ability to get what they want from this birth. After much “deliberation” they decided that they were not going to hire a doula, based solely on their confidence in the hospital to give them what they want, and their desire for privacy. While I can completely respect their privacy request, I fail to see how birthing in a university hospital will give her much if any privacy…AND if she doesn’t even know who will be her health care provider at the birth…how is she confident that the hospital will give her what she needs? I wish there was some way to help open her naive eyes to the reality of birth in hospitals today. Her chances of getting to work with a mother friendly doc that understands and respects natural birth have got to be low! Reading your blog was comforting (because I know there are others who struggle with this) and depressing(because we have to struggle with this). I don’t want to have her hire me for her VBAC next time around. I want her to have the birth she desires now. I realize there isn’t much I can do for her at this point, which is why I am here, leaving my frustration with a bunch of like minded individuals. I am hoping things will go well for her and in the mean time, I’ve let her know that I am and will be available until the baby is born. just in case. Thanks for the space to rant.

      

    Sincerely,

    Jessica

      

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     

    Jessica, you can rant here anytime!!!  I Hear Ya Sister!  Loud and clear!!

     

    And now I leave you with one of my FAVORITE Monty Python skits of all time.  I have seen it a million times but it is still as hilarious (and eerily true) each time I see it.  Notice how the doctor invites in an army of people to watch.  It often feels like that where I work no matter what I do!!!

     

     

    The WORST Idea Since Routine Continuous Fetal Monitoring for Low Risk Mothers September 7, 2009

    My husband (being the techie cutie that he is) reads CNET news, a website about computers, the Internet, and groundbreaking technology as part of his morning routine.  The other day, while I was enjoying my Kashi cereal and checking out the latest blog posts on my Google Reader, my husband hollered over to me from his office and said,“Hey Melissa, have you heard of LaborPro?”  Until that moment I was having a pretty good Sunday morning.  I mean, I woke up refreshed and smiling, the sun was shining, and I was looking forward to what I felt was going to be a “good” day at work.  But my attitude quickly turned from happy-go-lucky to blinding rage when he uttered those eight little words. 

    (Okay, okay, so I think I am being a bit dramatic.  Maybe blinding rage is a bit strong.  But I was pretty upset!!)

    So what is LaborPro and why did it put me into such a tizzy you ask?  According to Trig Medical’s website (the Israeli company that is developing and recently won a Frost & Sullivan Technology Innovation of the Year Award for this GARBAGE), LaborPro is “a novel labor monitoring system that using ultrasound imaging measures continuously and objectively fetal position, presentation and station along with cervical dilatation. LaborPro quantitatively assesses and records vital labor parameters in real-time to enable obstetricians to make informed and accurate decisions throughout the labor process to improve both the quality and cost of obstetric care.”

     

     

     

    The website lists LaborPro’s capabilities as able to:  

    • Determine continuous station & position of fetal head by ultrasound imaging,
    • Provide radiation-free pelvimetry & birth canal modeling.
    • Perform one-step computerized “non-invasive” trans-vaginal digital examination (I’ll touch on that in moment)
    • Determine intermittent or continuous accurate measurement of cervical dilatation
    • Record comprehensive labor data recording

     

    It also toutes its “unique benefits” as the following: 

    • Non-invasive, precise measurement of station & position
    • Improves assessment of non-progressive labor
    • Supports decision-making before operative delivery
    • User friendly, on-screen display of all labor parameters
    • Enhances patient comfort and sense of security

     

    Okay okay okay….Just HOW does it do this you ask?  Well it’s EASY!  (*rolling eyes*)  Well according to the website’s one mintute educational video (check it out here, it’s worth it).  FIRST you have to place “just four little electrodes” externally on the mother’s pelvis in order to continuously assess fetal station and position and also enables the user to ”recognize CPD early”.  SECOND you just have to clip (or screw) “just a few position sensors” to the woman’s cervix to accurately and continuously measure cervical dilation.  And THIRD you just have to screw “just a small little electrode” into the baby’s head.

    Fetal Scalp Electrode  (notice the little corkscrew tip)

    Close up of a fetal scalp electrode, or FSE (notice the little corkscrew tip, that screws into the baby's scalp.)

    According to Frost & Sullivan, the organization that awarded Trig Medical for the LaborPro technology writes, “The LaborPro is staff and mother-friendly and requires only basic training in ultrasound usage, obviating the need for an obstetric ultrasound expert,” adds Ms. Prabakar. “Moreover, the technology employs non-invasive, radiation-free pelvimetry as well as a single-step computerised digital examination. All labor progress tracking data including the fetal heart rate monitor are integrated in the LaborPro display and automatically recorded by the system, which helps reduce staff workload.”

     

    Oh great!  We only need “basic ultrasound skills” to work it!  (*double eye rolling*)  Here’s a novel idea!  How about every hospital (including my own) in the United States that has a L&D floor actually provide labor support training to their nurses instead!  That would go a lot farther for us than freaking ultrasound skills!! 

    (Just for the record, my hospital does NOT include labor support training as part of orientation and we are NOT alone.  At my hospital, if you want to learn how to provide labor support you have to seek out other learning opportunites on your own, like I had to.  But we do get extensive training on how to work and interpret the fetal monitor.  Oh and about 1/3 of our three month orientation is dedicated to learning how to care for a patient who is being induced.  In fact, I had to teach myself how to do intermittent auscultation and hence, I am one of the only nurses that I work with that isn’t “scared” of intermittent auscultation and will actually advocate for it!) 

    The most terrifying thing is that although at this time LaborPro is not available in the United States (Oh Hallelujah!!!) there is another company called Barnev based out of Andover, MA that has developed an almost identical product they call BirthTrack™ Continuous Labor Monitoring System which they describe as “a revolutionary continuous labor monitoring technology that provides obstetric caregivers invaluable, precise, objective, real-time information about the physical progress of labor. The BirthTrack System provides tools for a more informed decision making process through which hospitals can reduce the risks and costs of childbirth and assure the safety and comfort of mothers-to-be and their babies.”  I remember hearing about this product a couple of years ago when it was still in “development.”  Well guess what?!  Development is over!!  Marketing here we come!!  (GAG me!)

     

    So now there are at least TWO companies that are actively marketing this HORRIFIC, INHUMANE, and OUTRAGEOUS product.  Just wait  until LaborPro makes it to the United States (which according to their website they are actively persuing).  Then they will probably start to compete with eachother!  Now now only will labor & delivery wards around the country have to deal with Similac and Enfamil representatives competing for our money and attention in house (which already makes me sick to my stomach), but now I have to worry about this??!!  THIS IS TERRIFYING!!!

     

    I’m telling you right now, I will UP AND QUIT my job and never look back if either LaborPro or BirthTrack EVER  appears in even just one, JUST ONE of my hospital’s labor rooms.  QUIT ON THE SPOT!  And I will make a Hollywood exit too!  A HUGE scene!!!  Hooting and hollering!  You just wait!!  LOL!  As if our moms aren’t already strapped down enough with the often unnecessary and sometimes downright harmful technology we already have.  This is just TOO MUCH TO BEAR!

    I have taken care of MANY a laboring woman (often as a result of an induction, mind you) who are connected to:

     (1)  an IV line with IV fluids and Pitocin running through,

    (2) an electronic fetal monitor to measure fetal heart rate,

    (3) a tocodransducer to measure contraction pattern

    (OR a fetal scalp electrode to measure fetal heart rate and an intrauterine pressure catheter to measure contraction frequency and strength),

    4) an epidural catheter in the back giving a continuous flow of anethetic and narcotic medications into the spinal column,

    (5) a foley catheter in the bladder since it is very rare that one can empty their bladder with an epidural,

    (6)  a pulse oximeter to continuously measure blood oxygen level (necessitated by the epidural),

    (7) a blood pressure cuff to record one’s blood pressure every 15 minutes since an epidural can drop your blood pressure dangerously low, and finally

    (8) if the baby has shown any signs of distress, an oxygen mask for your face!

     

    Well I have a message for both Trig Medical and Barnev, LABORING WOMEN DO NOT NEED ANY MORE THINGS SHOVED UP THIER VAGINA!!!!  And furthermore,  CLIPING ANYTHING TO A WOMAN’S CERVIX OR SCREWING ANYTHING INTO A BABY’S HEAD DOES NOT COUNT AS “NON-INVASIVE”!!!  LABORING WOMEN AND BABIES ARE NOT ROBOTS THAT DON’T FEEL ANY PAIN OR DISCOMFORT!!!!  RESEARCH HAS SHOWN TIME AND TIME AGAIN THAT LESS IS MORE WHEN IT COMES TO LABOR FOR HEALTHY MOMS AND BABIES!!!  CONTINUITY OF CARE IS MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE, LESS PAINFUL, LESS INVASIVE THAN ANY “COMPUTERIZED FINGER.”

    Furthermore, LaborPro and BirthTrack are a slap in the face to every labor and delivery nurse that cares about giving appropriate, effective, competent, physiological, and compassionate care to childbearing families.   Unfortunately I would bet my hard earned money that at least half of the doctors I currently work with would think that this is a good idea. 

    Okay, okay, now that I am all riled up again I have to go to work  :(    Please check out Rixa’s post over at Stand and Deliver about BirthTrack.  It was written about a year ago and I stumbled upon it when I was searching for a picture of a fetal scalp electrode!!

    Change has GOT to come!  It’s GOT to!  For the health and wellness of our mothers and babies!!  Remember ladies, YOU actually have more power than ME and all the other L&D nurses out there!!  That’s right!  If you do not hire birth attendants that do not support evidenced based medicine and physiological birth and do not patronize hospitals that do not support a family-centered approach to maternity care then and only then will they start to listen.  You know why?  Because when the customers aren’t comin’, it hits them where it hurts… in their WALLET!!

     

    Believe! A Tear-Jerkin’ Inspirational Midwifery Ad September 4, 2009

    The other day I stumbled upon a YouTube video advertisement for a midwife in Albuquerque, New Mexico via a friend’s facebook page.  You’d think that I must get sick of watching videos of births and babies since I am, after all, a labor and delivery nurse but alas, I am a true birth junkie and just can’t get enough!!  I don’t know anything about the midwife in the movie but I have to say that not only do I BELIEVE everything she quotes in the video but I wish that every health care professional that provides care for childbearing familes felt and practiced the same way as she does! 

     

    I believe that every mother DESERVES a midwife and that every baby DESERVES to be born into gentle hands!

     

     

     

    The following is from Citizens for Midwifery:

     

    The Midwives Model of Care

    The Midwives Model of Care is based on the fact that pregnancy and birth are normal life processes.

    The Midwives Model of Care includes:

    • Monitoring the physical, psychological, and social well-being of the mother throughout the childbearing cycle
    • Providing the mother with individualized education, counseling, and prenatal care, continuous hands-on assistance during labor and delivery, and postpartum support
    • Minimizing technological interventions
    • Identifying and referring women who require obstetrical attention

     

    The application of this woman-centered model of care has been proven to reduce the incidence of birth injury, trauma, and cesarean section.

    Copyright (c) 1996-2008, Midwifery Task Force, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

     

    Coming Soon: Free Movie “Reducing Infant Mortality” July 1, 2009

     

    Thanks to Maria at the Massachusetts Friends of Midwives Blog, I just stumbled across a a trailer for a new documentary that will be FREE to view on July 26, 2009.  The video is titled “Reducing Infant Mortality and Improving the Health of Babies” and is sponsored by the Santa Barbara Graduate Institute Center for Clinical Studies and Rearch. 

     

    Watch the trailer here!

     

     

    As stated on the website, “This free film will be a tool for everyone to use to draw attention to infant mortality and health issues as national health care policy is debated on Capitol Hill.”

     

    The movie’s official website also reads:

    The current US Health Care System is failing babies and families before, during and after birth. At this critical moment when the US government is re-envisioning our health care system, we are seizing the opportunity to make a 10-12 minute video not only to point out the flaws in the way we care for babies and families, but also to identify the keys to improved care. Our infant mortality ranking is 42nd on the world stage which means 41 countries have better statistics. This places us right in the middle of the following countries: Guam, Cuba, Croatia and Belarus, with over double the infant deaths compared to the top 10 countries of the world. (CIA World Factbook).

    Our astronomically high African American infant mortality rate at 16 deaths per 1,000 is similar to countries such as Malaysia and the West Bank. Not only are babies dying needlessly, but the ones who survive this failing system are also often adversely affected by unnecessary procedures and separation from mother and family. Our intent with this video is to encourage policy makers to consider a health care system that holds prevention of these calamities as a high priority.  The midwifery model of care for healthy low-risk women is a simple solution which addresses many of these issues simultaneously.

    We are advocating for a health care system in which it will be standard procedure for mothers and babies to thrive and not merely survive through birth and early life. The midwifery model of care will save our health care system millions of dollars each year.
     

    To read about the credentials of the experts you see in the film’s trailer please visit  About the Film  and scroll to the bottom.

     

    Spread the word!!

     

     

     

    Stand And Deliver! Research Shows Upright Labor Positions Reduce Pain, Speed Birth April 15, 2009

    As if we all didn’t already know this!  :)

     

    Medical News Today posted a story on a new study published in the latest issue of The Cochrane Library which found that women who walk, sit, kneel or otherwise avoid lying in bed during early labor can shorten the first stage of labor by about an hour and are also 17 percent less likely to seek pain relief through epidural analgesia.  On the whole, the review examined 21 studies totaling 3,706 births.  After reviewing the research the authors’ concluded, “Women should be encouraged to take up whatever position they find most comfortable in the first stage of labour.”

     

    The Cochrane Collaboration is an international organization that evaluates medical research by performing systematic reviews and drawing evidence-based conclusions about medical practice after considering both the content and quality of existing medical studies on a particular topic.

     

    I would probably bet money on the fact that every savvy birth junkie or mom reading this blog already knows this J.  I just love when the research supports what midwives and mothers have instinctually known for centuries!!

     

    So get up and move girl!!  Beware of any intervention that restricts your movement and, YES, this includes unnecessary and elective inductions.  This is the #1 reason women end up with all the needless and risky interventions in the first place.  The LESS unnecessary interventions the MORE you will be able to move!

     

    Why The Today Show Hurts America (or, Battling The Case Against Breastfeeding) March 18, 2009

    The Today Show hurts America.  That’s right.  And while I’m at it, so does Good Morning America, The Early Show, Fox & Friends, and every other American morning “news” and talk show that propagates careless, partial research and half-truths.  And Monday, it got personal. 

     

    The American media has been finding itself in a heap of trouble lately.  First it was the political media that failed us by not accurately and truthfully reporting the state of events leading up to the war in Iraq.  Then it was the economic press, failing to appropriately and honestly alert us to the foreseeable consequences to greedy and dishonest deeds on Wall Street and in corporate America.  And now it’s the morning news/talk show circuit (and I use “news” lightly) that is flooding American homes with irresponsible, half-assed, and poorly researched segments that can have a profoundly negative impact on the breastfeeding culture as we know it.

     

    Case in point, Monday’s segment titled Is breast-feeding really best?: The case against breastfeeding, hosted by The Today Show’s Natalie Morales, advertised with the tag line, “Some women are questioning whether the health benefits are worth it.”  When I saw this segment and read the “supporting” article on www.today.msnbc.com I honestly started to cry; my entire being was deeply saddened by the potential negative consequences this garbage could have on impressionable gestating and new mothers all over this country.

     

    The segment starts by citing the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that mothers breastfeed their children exclusively for the first 6 months and continue to breastfeed while introducing solid foods for the first year.  After this, the segment goes downhill fast.   Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC’s chief medical editor, continues by apathetically listing an incomplete inventory of the health benefits of breastfeeding for both babies and mothers and then states (and this is a direct quote), “But some challenge the science is not so strong.”  [I will get to that outrageous untruth in just a moment.]

     

    Next to speak is Hanna Rosin, a breastfeeding (that’s right) mother of three who recently wrote an article for the current issue of The Atlantic magazine entitled The case against breastfeeding.  Morales prompts Rosin with the statement, “You are not anti-breastfeeding but you do talk about the society pressures.  Explain,” to which Rosin responds, “New moms are really vulnerable.  You go into the doctor’s office, you read the magazines, and they make you feel like you are putting your child in grave danger if you don’t breastfeed them.  And then you read the scientific literature and frankly, there isn’t the solid evidence you would expect to support this.”

     

    Let’s take these outrageous statements one at a time shall we! 

     

    Bogus Claim #1 I believe Rosin is right when she says that new moms are vulnerable and because of this, I feel like we should be using our resources and energy in this country to increase support for pregnant and postpartum moms instead of going on television and touting why one shouldn’t breastfeed!  In fact, pregnancy is a time when most women find themselves really starting to form a healthy obsession with researching everything they can about pregnancy, birth, and child rearing.  And that is good! We have come a long way from the 1950s when women were given hormone injections to dry up their milk, left alone as their babies were taken from them for hours or days after birth, told that their breasts were either “too big” or “too small” to breastfeed, or worse, that breastfeeding was only for “poor” or “uneducated” women.  It is sad that Rosin does not see how wonderful it is that magazines and physicians are finally on board with reporting on the benefits of breastfeeding and how to be successful at it!  And if those articles make women feel “bad” about choosing not to breastfeed, that doesn’t mean that these articles are bad, it might just mean that these particular women might need more education and support during pregnancy and postpartum.

     

    Bogus Claim #2 As far as there not being enough scientific literature supporting the benefits of breastfeeding, how about this: a meta analysis published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (AHRQ) in 2007 entitled “Breastfeeding and Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes in Developed Countries,” which reviewed over 9,000 abstracts, 43 preliminary studies, 43 primary studies on maternal health outcomes, and 29 systematic reviews or meta-analyses that covered approximately 400 individual studies on breastfeeding concluded with the following:

    “A history of breastfeeding was associated with a reduction in the risk of acute otitis media, non-specific gastroenteritis, severe lower respiratory tract infections, atopic dermatitis, asthma (young children), obesity, type 1 and 2 diabetes, childhood leukemia, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and necrotizing enterocolitis [for the child].  For maternal outcomes, a history of lactation was associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, breast, and ovarian cancer…Early cessation of breastfeeding or not breastfeeding was associated with an increased risk of maternal postpartum depression.”

    An article posted yesterday on Motherwear’s Breastfeeding Blog originally referenced this study and I highly recommend reading the post as it is both informative and extremely well put!  As far as Rosin’s article, she only cites 2, that’s right…two research articles to support her argument that there isn’t enough evidence that “Breast is Best.”

     

     

    Bogus Claim #3 The segment continues with Rosin stating, “I feel like many people do feel like they’ve failed, if they can’t breastfeed or have trouble breastfeeding, or if they want to stop breastfeeding.  They just feel like ‘I’m giving my kid poison if I give them formula’, and it really isn’t like that.”  In Rosin’s article she also gaffs at the idea of a “lactation consultant” by writing “(note to the childless: yes, this is an actual profession, and it’s thriving).  

     

    What Rosin fails to realize is that lactation consultants are a woman’s ally, not enemy.  Their training and purpose is not to make women feel bad about not being able to or having trouble with breastfeeding, but rather to assist them in anyway so that they can become successful at breastfeeding!  And if after their help a woman still cannot breastfeed (for whatever reason), then at least she can rest assured that gave it her best. Should other mothers now judge this mother?  Of course not!  But that doesn’t mean that the information and support about breastfeeding should not be provided to that mother first!  Rosin alludes to the fact that in this country, women do not have enough postpartum support and yet she degrades one profession that seeks to do just that!  And furthermore I’d like to shout, Hey NBC!!!  How about next time you put together a panel to speak about breastfeeding issues, you include someone who actually is an expert in breastfeeding or breastfeeding education, like a lactation counselor, La Leche League leader, pediatrician, nurse, midwife, or obstetrician, instead of an Otolaryngologist (a head and neck surgeron) who specializes in head and neck cancer.  (That’s right, Dr. Nancy Snyderman is an otolaryngologist).  To me, that’s downright irresponsible journalism. 

     

    Bogus Claim #4  Both Snyderman and Rosin stress the inconveniences of breastfeeding throughout the segment as well as pointing out the societal pressures against it.  “If you want to clear a zone of inhibition around your lunch table [at work], breastfeed your baby in public,” squawks Snyderman. By this point in the show, I began to think to myself, what is this segment’s main argument?  Is it that some mothers know the benefits of breastfeeding, but question whether the benefits are worth it to them?  OR Is it that breastfeeding does not offer health advantages for both mother and baby over formula feeding?  I hate to break it to the Today Show, but the former statement, although very saddening, is probably true…but the later statement is just blatantly FALSE! 

     

    Is it that mothers should support each other, even if situations beyond their control arise that prevent their ability or shorten the length of time they’re able to breastfeed? OR Is it that formula is just as good as breast milk and therefore breastfeeding isn’t worth the “bother and inconvenience?”  Because again the former statement is true…but the later statement is blatantly FALSE!  Sadly, the Today Show automatically promotes both of the later statements with its sensationalized hooks and trailers for the segment, which were repeated before every commercial break for 30 minutes before the piece aired.  Oh, and by the way Snyderman, formula might not be poison, but I certainly don’t think it is conscientious to go on national television and call it “wonderful” and as healthy of an alternative.”

     

     

    Bogus Claim #5  On www.today.msnbc.com, Mike Celizic recaps the segment by writing, “After decades of indoctrination delivered with evangelical fervor, American women have come to take it as an article of faith that if they don’t breast-feed their children, they’ll grow up to be underachievers plagued with health problems and lacking a bond with their mother.”  Oh the drama! (…Give me a break!!)

     

    In reality, if an organization or health care provider details and promotes the benefits of breastfeeding it does NOT mean that they are telling women that not breastfeeding their child will result in harm and danger.  It’s about RISK REDUCTION.  The truth is, research supports the belief that breastfeeding might lower your child’s risk for a variety of illnesses and reduce a mother’s risk for things like postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum depression.  That doesn’t mean that every woman who bottle feeds will get postpartum depression and her baby is guaranteed to be plagued with frequent diarrhea and ear infections.  It just helps decrease their risk!

     

    Furthermore, when I go to the dentist and the dentist looks at my teeth and says to me, “Have you been flossing twice a day?” and I say “No…” and then he goes over the benefits of flossing and the risks of not flossing, what is wrong about that interaction?  True, I might be a bit embarrassed and feel a bit guilty about not flossing, but that doesn’t mean that the dentist should NOT tell me about the benefits of flossing!  It would be irresponsible of him as a health care provider to not at least make sure I knew all the risks and benefits and then if I still decide that flossing isn’t something that’s “worth the time”, then I have the right to make that decision for myself as an adult.  But throughout her article, time and time again, Rosin writes negatively about providing women with counsel and educational information regarding breastfeeding, NOT just about the unfortunate judgment that some women might face from their peers if they make the decision not breastfeed.  When I ask a patient if she is going to breast or bottle feed during my admission interview as a labor & delivery nurse, and she tells me she is going to bottle feed, it is my responsibility as a health care provider to ask her about her reasons and provide her with educational breastfeeding materials so that I know in the end, if she decides breastfeeding is not for her, it is not because of misinformation, old wives tales, misguided pressures from family, or a lack of education, but because it is just her decision.   

     

    Bogus Claim #6 As for the time commitment argument, on the show Rosin stated “…and we all know what a time commitment breastfeeding is… I mean it’s a pretty serious commitment to breastfeed.  It’s not like taking a prenatal vitamin.”  She elaborates on this position in her article by writing, “[Breast-feeding]is a serious time commitment that pretty much guarantees that you will not work in any meaningful way. This is why, when people say that breast-feeding is “free,” I want to hit them with a two-by-four. It’s only free if a woman’s time is worth nothing.” 

     

    First I personally know women who work in offices, restaurants, schools, parks, and hospitals, in white collar jobs and blue collar jobs, as doctors, nurses, teachers, farmers, bus drivers, waitresses, and stay-at-home moms, who would like Rosin to know that they believe, as well as myself and many others, that their work IS meaningful.  And if you are a mom who feels differently, who feels “miserable, stressed out, or alienated by nursing, or who feels her marriage is under stress and breast-feeding is making things worse”, then perhaps you are right.  Perhaps you shouldn’t be breastfeeding and perhaps you should also honestly consider obtaining counseling or joining a support group for new mothers because breastfeeding probably isn’t the root of all of your problems.  But for goodness’ sake, for Rosin to go around writing and stating on national television that “the actual health benefits of breast-feeding are surprisingly thin” and that breastfeeding is just “instrument of misery that mostly just keeps women down” [both direct quotes] is untrue, misleading, and hurtful to gestating and new mothers everywhere, both planning and not planning to breastfeed.

     

    Second, I would like Rosin to know that MANY healthy practices in life take a time commitment.  Our primary care physicians and cardiologists often tell us Americans about the health benefits of eating a well balanced diet low in saturated fat as well as the benefits of exercising regularly.  Everything we do in our lives to better our health takes time, but that doesn’t mean that our doctors and other health care providers shouldn’t continue to educate people on these healthy practices just because people might feel “guilty” if they don’t do them!  And it also doesn’t mean that if you don’t exercise three times a week and eat a balanced diet that you are guaranteed to die of a heart attack.  It just helps to reduce your risk!

     

    In conclusion, the state of maternity care and postpartum support in this country is in a crisis, and if we don’t even have the media reporting good research and promoting healthy living for ourselves and our children, it is only going to continue to get worse.  Shame on NBC for being so irresponsible; it’s one thing for The Atlantic to publish an opinion piece (no matter how outrageous), but it is another thing to put this woman and her bogus research on national television and try to pass it off as news.  The unfortunate thing is that for some people, shows like Today are their only source of news!  As a society, we should be focusing our energy towards making things better for new mothers by using the power of the media for good, like airing segments on breastfeeding/new parent support groups and tools for breastfeeding success or helping to pass legislation that makes appropriate break time, a clean & quiet place to pump, and an adequate place to store milk something that is available to ALL working mothers!  But instead the Today show decided to throw their hands up and agree that things are never going to change by providing unchallenged air time to this sorely misled mother.  And if shows like Today continue to propagate and support such astounding untruths on national television, they are going to continue to hurt America. 

     

    More Trouble With Repeat Cesareans February 23, 2009

    On Thursday February 19, 2009, TIME.com published a remarkable article entitled The Trouble With Repeat Cesareans which takes a hard look at the rising cesarean rate in the United States, making C-sections the most common women’s surgery in the country.  If you haven’t yet read the article I highly suggest you do!

     

    There are many things about this article that I like.  First off, to find an article tackling the lesser-known side of a debate, like the “VBAC-lash” as author Pamela Paul so aptly describes it, is uncommon in popular, highly circulated news magazines (“VBAC” for those that are not familiar with the term, stands for “Vaginal Birth After Cesarean”).  Typically media outlets like these go for what I like to call the “rare & scare” stories like such nonsense as, “The 100 ways your baby could die at birth!” and “Midwives Going Postal!”  The major and life-threatening consequences related to our country’s rising cesarean rate and the rapidly declining opportunities that women have to plan for a VBAC are serious public health and women’s health issues that need and deserve national attention!

     

    The second thing I really like about this article is the title; “The Trouble With Repeat Cesareans” couldn’t be more appropriate.  Kudos to the editors of TIME magazine for nailing it with this one, considering that currently 9 out of 10 births following a cesarean are also a cesarean.  Clearly there are too many obstetricians and even many women not taking the risks of multiple major abdominal surgeries seriously! 

     

    Thirdly, I think author Pamela Paul does a great job emphasizing the risks related to repeat cesarean sections when she writes,

    “With each repeat cesarean, a mother’s risk of heavy bleeding, infection and infertility, among other complications, goes up. Perhaps most alarming, repeat C-sections increase a woman’s chances of developing life-threatening placental abnormalities that can cause hemorrhaging during childbirth. The rate of placenta accreta–in which the placenta attaches abnormally to the uterine wall–has increased thirty fold in the past 30 years.”

    Much too often articles related to this subject only report on the risks of VBAC and not the risks and complications of repeat C-sections which is both misleading and dangerous!  I would like to take this opportunity to elaborate on Paul’s list by citing some other serious risks related to repeat cesareans, as outlined in the book The Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth by Henci Goer (pg 168):

    1.      Increased risk of injury to other organs, including bladder & bowels,

    2.      Anesthesia complications including spinal headache, low blood pressure, backache, infection, nerve damage (including paralysis, loss of bladder and bowel function, loss of sexual function), allergic reactions, seizures, cardiac arrest and death (see: Redding Anesthesia),

    3.      Scar tissue formation (called adhesions) resulting from every abdominal surgery leading to a more complicated surgery with each additional cesarean which increases a mother’s chance of chronic pain and bowel problems,

    4.      Increased risks for baby including poor condition at birth, breathing difficulties, bruising, and jaundice,

    5.      Increased risk of placental abnormalities including placenta accreta (described above) and placenta previa (where the placenta grows over the cervix) putting mother at risk for a life threatening hemorrhage during the pregnancy & delivery, which could result in hysterectomy in serious cases, and

    6.      Increased risk of ectopic pregnancy (a surgical emergency where a fertilized egg implants somewhere besides the uterus (e.g. in a fallopian tube)).

    The Bottom Line: All of these complications increase a mother’s risk of prolonged hospitalization, hysterectomy, and maternal death. 

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     

    Although I feel the article made some great points, I feel that some very important facts were either missed or not stressed enough in the article and at this time I would like to share some additional information that I feel will provide you with a more comprehensive picture of the VBAC/Repeat Cesarean debate.  Here we go!

     

    (1)   FACT: The high-profile cases of uterine rupture during a VBAC in the 1990s were directly related to the use of the drug Cytotec (generic name misoprostol) for labor induction on women with a history of a prior C-section. 

     

    Marsden Wagner writes in his book Born in the USA: How a Broken Maternity System Must Be Fixed to Put Women and Children First that between the years of 1994 and 1999 approximately 25,000 women in the United States who had previously undergone a prior C-section were given Cytotec for labor induction and out of those women, 1,000 of them suffered ruptured uteruses, a rate that is a twenty-eight fold increase in the rate of rupture over having a VBAC without Cytotec induction.  He also writes that despite years of mounting evidence and research studies reporting the risks of using Cytotec for labor induction on women with uterine scars, OBGYNs continued to use the drug (which was neither approved by the FDA for labor induction nor clinically trialed in a research study for a safe and effective dose) for this very purpose proving once again the pervasive anti-precautionary obstetrical culture of “assumed safe until proven otherwise.”

     

     

    (2)   FACT: Women can safely have a VBAC in a hospital, an out-of-hospital birth center, and even at home!  (And they have too!)  VBAC becomes more and more risky when you start to obstetrically intervene, like in the case of labor induction and augmentation.

     

    Wagner writes,

        The phenomenon [with the increase in uterine ruptures during VBAC in the 1990s] was almost certainly related to the fact that the percentage of births in which powerful drugs, such as Cytotec, were used to induce labor had doubled, given that studies show there is an increased risk of uterine rupture with pharmacological induction.  But instead of acknowledging and addressing this connection by recommending that obstetricians not use Cytotec for induction, the organization recommended that a women not be permitted to attempt a [VBAC] unless she was in a hospital where an  anesthesiologist was [immediately available].  In other words, instead of preventing uterine rupture, ACOG said that we should surround the woman with experts to deal with the rupture when it happens.  This is like trying to solve the problem of children drowning at summer camp by not teaching the children to swim, but rather by putting a couple of life preservers in the lake.”

     

    (3)   FACT: A cesarean section performed after an attempted VBAC is NOT necessarily an emergency cesarean section! 

     

    In the TIME article, author Pamela Paul writes:

    “Yet as of 2006, only about 8% of births were VBACs, and the numbers continue to fall–even though 73% of women who go this route successfully deliver without needing an emergency cesarean.”

     

    In other words, the 27% of women that Paul describes needing a C-section after an attempted VBAC did not necessarily have an emergency cesarean, contrary to what Paul writes.  The high-risk urban hospital where I am currently employed as a labor & delivery nurse (which happens to have anesthesia and an attending physician in house 24/7) classifies the urgency of cesarean sections into 4 categories:

                ● Category I (STAT): Immediate threat to life of woman or fetus (e.g. prolapsed umbilical cord, uterine rupture, anaphylactoid syndrome, prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration with no return to baseline).  Luckily, these are the most rare type of all cesarean sections; however, the risk of needing a STAT cesarean increases with more obstetrical interventions.

                ● Category II (URGENT): Maternal or fetal compromise, not immediately life threatening (e.g. non reassuring fetal heart rate pattern, like prolonged and repetitive variable decelerations or repetitive late decelerations caused by cord compression or utero-placental insufficiency).  Indications for these types of cesareans allow for the physician and anesthesia to get to the hospital (quickly of course) and for nursing to prepare the patient.  Don’t get me wrong, these cesareans are considered an emergency, but they allow for decision making and (rapid) preparation, unlike category I cesareans, which always require immediate transfer to the operating room and general anesthesia.

                ● Category III (ASAP): Needing early delivery but no maternal or fetal compromise (e.g. “failure to progress,” “dysfunctional labor,” and “cephalopelvic disproportion.”)  This category of cesareans is what the majority of women who have attempted a VBAC but ended up needing surgery will encounter.  They require a timely delivery but these women often “sit” for hours if needed, like if the operating room is currently working on a more urgent case.  These are NOT emergency cesareans.

                ● Category IV (INTRAPARTUM SCHEDULED): At a time to suit the mother and maternity team (e.g. scheduled primary or repeat cesarean sections for indications such as breech baby, stable placenta previa, and elective repeat cesarean). 

    As you can see, if you are one of the 27% of women who ends up with a C-section after an attempted VBAC it will not necessarily be an emergency, but unfortunately, that is what the public has been mislead into believing.  Regrettably, fear clouds good judgment.

     

     

    (4)   FACT: The current medicalized culture of childbirth in the United States, as well as the territorial nature of obstetricians have resulted in the development and use of the so-called “informed consent” form for VBAC, but no such form is routinely given to patients who agree to scheduled repeat cesareans. 

     

    In The Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth, author Henci Goer writes:

                “[The informed consent for VBAC form] details all the horrible things that could potentially happen should the scar give way during a VBAC.  But this form is not really about informed consent because it says nothing about all the equally horrible things that could potentially result from an elective cesarean.  In fact, the obstetrician editor of OBG Management, who devised its prototype and promotes use of such forms, openly admits that the motivation behind them is forestalling lawsuits and that using them will ‘send your C/S rates soaring.’”

     

    Why are we teaching our women to fear birth but blindly accept risky obstetrical interventions and major abdominal surgery as no bid deal?  We’ve got it backwards!  When the operative consent for a repeat cesarean is reviewed with patients at my hospital, the residency staff is taught the following spiel, and I quote, “This is a consent for your doctor to perform a cesarean section for you today.  The risks of the procedure include injury to your bowels or bladder, infection, and bleeding, all of which are very rare and can also occur in a vaginal delivery.  Sign on the X please.”  Talk about spinning the facts and lying by omission! 

     

    The obstetrical community spends a lot of energy arguing that it should be a woman’s right to choose whether they undergo the “risks” of VBAC or choose the more “controlled” and “predictable” option of the repeat cesarean section.  While I agree with basic idea behind this (i.e. that a woman deserves the right to make choices about her own body), OBGYN providers in this country are NOT providing patients with true informed consent.  In addition, these obstetricians are especially not letting women on to a very important and real phenomenon that is a direct result of the cesarean epidemic: The first cesarean is very easy but the second, third, forth, and fifth cesareans are exponentially more complicated and dangerous. 

     

    Which leads me to my next point…

     

    (5)   FACT: Women are notoriously bad at predicting how many children they will have at the time of their first delivery.

     

    A 2008 research study published by physicians in the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology found that at the time of a woman’s first pregnancy, “many women underestimate their final parity,” meaning at the time of their first baby, almost 40% of women thought that they were eventually going to have fewer children than they actually ended up having.  This research finding is very important to the VBAC debate because many women figure that if they are only planning to have one more baby, then it is “no big deal” to have a repeat cesarean.  

     

    …Until of course they separate from their partner or go through a divorce, meet someone new and want to have baby with their new partner.  Or what about those women who never expected that “oops” pregnancy after what was supposed to be their last baby. Or the couples who decided that they really do want to try for that baby boy/girl they don’t have after all!  Not only do these scenarios happen but they are common in today’s society.  So what are we left with?  A bunch of women who thought they were going to have just one more cesarean, that now are going for their third or forth, resulting in even less providers who will attend their VBAC and even more risk for complications if they even try.

     

    Bottom line, we need to change our whole mindset when it comes to VBAC.  When a woman undergoes her first C-section, everyone should just assume that if she gets pregnant again she will plan for a VBAC, NOT the other way around!  North American obstetricians should not have to be dragged into doing VBACs.  If there is a good reason why a woman can’t VBAC, like prior classical uterine scar/extensive uterine surgery or placenta previa, its then and only then that our providers recommend a repeat cesarean.  OBGYNs tend to forget that the only way one can know that a VBAC will or will not be successful is to allow the woman to labor!  In her book The Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth, Goer reports that several studies published in leading obstetric journals have found that when physicians “genuinely encouraged women to have VBACs, most of them did, and when they said nothing or acted neutral, most women didn’t.”   

        

    (6)    FACT: Physician convenience should not enter into the VBAC debate at all!  With the safety of our mothers and babies at stake, the “make it home in time for dinner” phenomenon among obstetricians is unsafe, selfish, and irrelevant.

     

    In the TIME article, Paul writes,

    “Among obstetricians, many solo practitioners are unable to stay for what could end up being a 24-hour delivery; others calculate the loss of unseen patients during that time and instead opt to do hour-long cesareans, which are now the most commonly performed surgeries on women in the U.S.”

    I feel Paul has correctly captured the attitude of too many obstetricians in this country (and how outrageous it is!).  First of all, putting “time limits” on how long a woman should be “allowed” to labor is preposterous and irresponsible and often leads to the unnecessary “cascade of interventions” too often seen during labor in a hospital setting.  Newsflash! Labor takes time.  This fact of life should not be an indication for cesarean section.  This is why physicians and midwives form group practices, so one can be “on-call” while the others can be in the office seeing patients or have the day off.  Perhaps “solo practitioners” need to rethink their business strategy instead of “opting” to perform unnecessary major abdominal surgery on the unsuspecting women of our country. 

     

    And lastly…

     

    (7)   FACT: BIRTH IS SAFE, INTERVENTIONS ARE RISKY!

     

    I wish I could scream this from the rooftop of every labor and delivery ward in this country.   In Paul’s article she reports, “Some doctors, however, argue that any facility ill equipped for VBACs shouldn’t do labor and delivery at all.”  I hate to break it to these physicians but 24/7 in house anethesia is not necessary for a woman to have a VBAC.  It seems like it is just impossible for many obstetricians to open their eyes and realize that the research and statistics of 26 other countries with better maternal and fetal mortality rates than our own have shown, time and time again, that birth can safely happen OUTSIDE of the hospital.  You heard me right!  For women with normal, low-risk, uncomplicated pregnancies, labor and delivery can safely and does safely occur in homes and out-of-hospital birth centers around this country (and the WORLD) every single day. 

     

    Look, if it was true that prominent national figures in power were never wrong, then John McCain wouldn’t have told the American people that “the fundamentals of our economy are sound” two days before our country began its slide down into the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression!

     

    So what does it all mean?  In conclusion, whether you are a pregnant mom, partner, labor companion, concerned citizen, healthcare professional, or birth advocate, I just hope that when it comes to the “VBAC debate”, you will make a truly informed decision based on sound research and evidenced-based recommendations rather than become subject to the dangers of defensive medicine and poor or untrue information that currently plagues our existing maternity system in the United States.

     

     

     

     

    Attn Docs: Natural Labor is NOT a Medical Emergency! February 12, 2009

    Filed under: Ramblings — NursingBirth @ 2:14 PM
    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    I recently read an article that made me smile on the Mothering magazine’s website entitled “Juicy Labor” by Esty Schachter.  Schachter writes about her labor with her second son as involving lots of walking around her apartment for most of the day until eventually deciding to go to the hospital after breaking her bag of waters.  One thing I found endearing about her story is the description of her experience in the triage area of the labor & delivery ward: “I said I wanted to push, but no one except Jon [her husband] seemed to hear me. That’s when I should have realized a vital bit of information: quiet women in labor will not get attention. Labor is simply not the time for restraint or subtlety.”  Schachter describes the initial skepticism of her doctor and the triage nurse that she had actually broken her water and was in labor followed by shock when it was realized that she was fully dilated (or as the doctor described it, “good to go!”)

               

    I have been in this very position myself many times in my short career: woman approaches desk in wheelchair, restless, doing the “one cheek sneak*,” but very in control, turns out to be 9 centimeters with a bulging bag of waters!  The funny thing is that there is an inside joke around my department that if a patient approaches the desk calm, somewhat apprehensive, and without any luggage…she is probably in labor.  On the contrary, if a patient approaches the desk hooting and hollering with six suitcases and two pillows, chances are, it’s not the real thing!  Despite this inside joke, by default hooting and hollering always ends up getting you more attention, as Schachter so eloquently described!

               

    What really hit home for me when reading this story, however, was the interaction the author describes in the delivery room between the nurse and the obstetrician.  Maybe it’s the adrenaline rush of hurrying a stretcher down the hall, clumsily setting up the delivery cart and baby warmer, and barking orders at each other and the mother (“Don’t push!,”  “Start an IV!,” “Break the bed!,”  “Get me that…!”) that many doctors, and even some nurses, thrive on.  However if you think about, if a woman comes in ready to, or almost ready to deliver, it is more important than ever to try and keep things as cool, calm, and collected as you can, not only the mother’s emotional wellbeing, but for the progression of labor as well.  I have tried to explain this very concept to many of the new residents at work: A woman in transition or one ready to give birth is not a medical emergency!  True, we must all work as a team to provide appropriate care and support in a timely and efficient manner, but we don’t need to be busting through doors and screaming “PUSH!!”  I love how the nurse in Schachter’s story told the author to “do what nature told [her] to” despite the brash doctor’s demands.  It is a line I have used quite often in my own practice as an L&D nurse, right after I dim the lights and demand some level of quite from the bustling staff around me J.  At that moment, my attention is on mom and her needs, not the needs of anyone else. 

               

    To all the attending obstetricians, residents, and old school L&D nurses out there (who are probably not reading this post J), let us try to remember that when push comes to shove (no pun intended!), the admission assessment, IV, history & physical, and other paperwork can wait.  Your job at that moment is to help support the mother and include her partner or other labor companion in doing whatever will assist her the most.  She is, after all, the one doing all the real work and you are, in truth, privileged that she is even allowing you to be there to catch!

     

     

     

    *Note: The “one cheek sneak” is the affectionate name used to describe a move that is typical of a woman in true labor (although it’s meaning to L&D nurses is a bit different than it’s meaning per the late George Carlin!).  The rectal pressure from the baby and the back-to-back contractions make it difficult to sit without lifting one of your buttocks off the chair, all the while trying to maintain your composure and pant through the contractions!

     

     
    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 58 other followers